The barefoot shoe vs. The supportive shoe..my thoughts
There has been a longstanding debate in the foot health community regarding the benefits of wearing barefoot or minimalist shoes versus shoes with support.
Proponents of barefoot or minimalist footwear argue that minimalist shoes will enable the foot to function as naturally as possible.
Some features of minimalist shoes include:- Wide, naturally shaped toe box- Flexible upper- Thin sole
Barefoot or minimalist shoes strengthen the muscles, tendons, and ligaments in your feet and ankles, reducing the risk of injury in your lower body. On the flip side, the supportive shoe camp believes supportive shoes will help alleviate stress on joints and provide support especially in areas like the arch and heel. Thus improving balance and stability particularly in older adults.
Some characteristics of supportive shoes include:- Arch support- Cushioned midsole- Torsional stability Here's my 2 cents - as a shoe wearer👞👞👞👞

As an older adult, I firmly believe that supportive footwear is paramount. If your feet aren't happy, you're not happy. This is why I prefer supportive shoes. Having experienced several lower body and foot injuries in my youth, which have caught up with me and significantly impacted my feet, I require midfoot support to take pressure on the metatarsal joints (especially on my left foot). Without this support, it feels as though I'm walking on a bed of nails.
I argue that barefoot or minimalist shoes are for the young and spry, leaving those of us who suffer from...
.....all crave supportive shoes, like a junkie needing their next fix. Supportive shoes offer that comfort and support needed to keep you upright while walking, hiking, or jogging.
My thoughts,
Thanks for reading,
Chris McKenna
Comments
Post a Comment